What are the chances of seeing an Eye-ringed Flatbill in Celaque National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Eye-ringed Flatbill sighting in Celaque National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 104th most-seen of the 193 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Eye-ringed Flatbill in Celaque National Park?
April and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Eye-ringed Flatbill in Celaque National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June–July and November–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Eye-ringed Flatbill?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eye-ringed Flatbill sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Celaque National Park the best place to see an Eye-ringed Flatbill?
8th of 25
Of the 25 parks where we can rate Eye-ringed Flatbill sightings, Celaque National Park ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 30%), Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 20%) and El Triunfo (Mexico, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Eye-ringed Flatbill live in Celaque National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Eye-ringed Flatbill that you can see in Celaque National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 30%), Boat-billed Flycatcher (about 30%) and Greater Pewee (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Eye-ringed Flatbill sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eye-ringed Flatbill is recorded against all the birds logged in Celaque National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.