What are the chances of seeing an Eye-ringed Flatbill in Cusuco National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Eye-ringed Flatbill sighting in Cusuco National Park on a given day, based on 55 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 118th most-seen of the 250 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Eye-ringed Flatbill in Cusuco National Park?
June
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Eye-ringed Flatbill in Cusuco National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–May, July–August and November–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Eye-ringed Flatbill?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eye-ringed Flatbill sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cusuco National Park the best place to see an Eye-ringed Flatbill?
9th of 25
Of the 25 parks where we can rate Eye-ringed Flatbill sightings, Cusuco National Park ranks 9th at about 10%. The best odds are in Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 30%), Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 20%) and El Triunfo (Mexico, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Eye-ringed Flatbill live in Cusuco National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Eye-ringed Flatbill that you can see in Cusuco National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 50%), Social Flycatcher (about 50%) and Yellow-olive Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Eye-ringed Flatbill sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eye-ringed Flatbill is recorded against all the birds logged in Cusuco National Park (55 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.