What are the chances of seeing a Plaintive Cuckoo in Kaziranga National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Plaintive Cuckoo sighting in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, based on 29 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 232nd most-seen of the 323 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Plaintive Cuckoo in Kaziranga National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Plaintive Cuckoo in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season. June and July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Plaintive Cuckoo?
Between 1 and 4 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Plaintive Cuckoo sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kaziranga National Park the best place to see a Plaintive Cuckoo?
20th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Plaintive Cuckoo sightings, Kaziranga National Park ranks 20th at under 5%. The best odds are in Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 40%), Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 30%) and Taman Negara National Park (Malaysia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Plaintive Cuckoo live in Kaziranga National Park?
Same family: Cuculidae
The closest relatives of the Plaintive Cuckoo that you can see in Kaziranga National Park (family Cuculidae, Cuckoos) are Greater Coucal (about 40%), Green-billed Malkoha (about 20%) and Lesser Coucal (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Plaintive Cuckoo sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Plaintive Cuckoo is recorded against all the birds logged in Kaziranga National Park (29 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.