What are the chances of seeing an Asian Koel in Kaziranga National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Asian Koel sighting in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, based on 273 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 129th most-seen of the 323 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Asian Koel in Kaziranga National Park?
April and May
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report an Asian Koel in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to February, the lowest months. Those are among Kaziranga National Park's wettest months, with about 300 mm of rain a month against 10 mm in December. June and July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an Asian Koel?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Asian Koel sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kaziranga National Park the best place to see an Asian Koel?
21st of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Asian Koel sightings, Kaziranga National Park ranks 21st at about 10%. The best odds are in Gir National Park (India, about 40%), Udawalawe National Park (Sri Lanka, about 40%) and Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Asian Koel live in Kaziranga National Park?
Same family: Cuculidae
The closest relatives of the Asian Koel that you can see in Kaziranga National Park (family Cuculidae, Cuckoos) are Greater Coucal (about 40%), Green-billed Malkoha (about 20%) and Lesser Coucal (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Asian Koel sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Asian Koel is recorded against all the birds logged in Kaziranga National Park (273 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.