What are the chances of seeing a Common Pochard in Keoladeo National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Common Pochard sighting in Keoladeo National Park on a given day, based on 384 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 119th most-seen of the 278 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Pochard in Keoladeo National Park?
February
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Common Pochard in Keoladeo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to October, the lowest months. That is one of Keoladeo National Park's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain against 240 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Common Pochard?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Pochard sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Keoladeo National Park the best place to see a Common Pochard?
5th of 20
Of the 20 parks where we can rate Common Pochard sightings, Keoladeo National Park ranks 5th at about 20%. The best odds are in Doñana National Park (Spain, about 40%), Hortobágy National Park (Hungary, about 40%) and Kiskunság National Park (Hungary, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Pochard live in Keoladeo National Park?
Same genus: Aythya
The closest relatives of the Common Pochard that you can see in Keoladeo National Park (genus Aythya, Scaups, Pochards, and Allies) are Ferruginous Duck (about 20%) and Tufted Duck (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Pochard sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Pochard is recorded against all the birds logged in Keoladeo National Park (384 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.