What are the chances of seeing a Savanna Nightjar in Keoladeo National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Savanna Nightjar sighting in Keoladeo National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 269th most-seen of the 278 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Savanna Nightjar in Keoladeo National Park?
June and July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Savanna Nightjar in Keoladeo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to May, the lowest months. Those are among Keoladeo National Park's wettest months, with about 150 mm of rain a month against 5 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see a Savanna Nightjar?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Savanna Nightjar sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Keoladeo National Park the best place to see a Savanna Nightjar?
16th of 16
Of the 16 parks where we can rate Savanna Nightjar sightings, Keoladeo National Park ranks 16th at under 5%. The best odds are in Bali Barat National Park (Indonesia, about 40%), Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 30%) and Satpura National Park (India, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Savanna Nightjar live in Keoladeo National Park?
Same genus: Caprimulgus
The closest relatives of the Savanna Nightjar that you can see in Keoladeo National Park (genus Caprimulgus, Old World Nightjars) are Jungle Nightjar (about 10%) and Indian Nightjar (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Savanna Nightjar sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Savanna Nightjar is recorded against all the birds logged in Keoladeo National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.