What are the chances of seeing a Long-tailed Shrike in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Long-tailed Shrike sighting in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, based on 23 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 24th most-seen of the 203 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Long-tailed Shrike in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
January
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Long-tailed Shrike in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–April, August and October–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Long-tailed Shrike?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Long-tailed Shrike sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kerinci Seblat National Park the best place to see a Long-tailed Shrike?
11th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Long-tailed Shrike sightings, Kerinci Seblat National Park ranks 11th at about 30%. The best odds are in Mudumalai National Park (India, about 60%), Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 50%) and Jim Corbett National Park (India, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Long-tailed Shrike live in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Long-tailed Shrike that you can see in Kerinci Seblat National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher (about 70%), Gray-throated Babbler (about 60%) and Golden Babbler (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Long-tailed Shrike sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Long-tailed Shrike is recorded against all the birds logged in Kerinci Seblat National Park (23 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.