What are the chances of seeing a Whitethroat in Meru National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Whitethroat sighting in Meru National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 210th most-seen of the 243 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Whitethroat in Meru National Park?
November
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Whitethroat in Meru National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June, September–October and December–January, the lowest months. That is one of Meru National Park's wettest months, with about 200 mm of rain against almost none in July. May and July–August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Whitethroat?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Whitethroat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Meru National Park the best place to see a Whitethroat?
15th of 36
Of the 36 parks where we can rate Whitethroat sightings, Meru National Park ranks 15th at about 10%. The best odds are in Biebrza National Park (Poland, about 30%), Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park (Mongolia, about 30%) and Białowieża National Park (Poland, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Whitethroat live in Meru National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Whitethroat that you can see in Meru National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Superb Starling (about 90%), White-headed Buffalo-Weaver (about 80%) and Fork-tailed Drongo (about 80%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Whitethroat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Whitethroat is recorded against all the birds logged in Meru National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.