What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Mourner in Piedras Blancas National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Mourner sighting in Piedras Blancas National Park on a given day, based on 126 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 166th most-seen of the 344 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Mourner in Piedras Blancas National Park?
March and October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Mourner in Piedras Blancas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–May and November–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Mourner?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Mourner sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Piedras Blancas National Park the best place to see a Rufous Mourner?
Among the best
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Rufous Mourner sightings, Piedras Blancas National Park ranks 10th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Darién National Park (Panama, about 10%), Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 10%) and Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Rufous Mourner live in Piedras Blancas National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous Mourner that you can see in Piedras Blancas National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 60%), Great Kiskadee (about 60%) and Social Flycatcher (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Mourner sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Mourner is recorded against all the birds logged in Piedras Blancas National Park (126 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.