What are the chances of seeing an Eye-ringed Flatbill in Poás Volcano National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Eye-ringed Flatbill sighting in Poás Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 301st most-seen of the 356 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Eye-ringed Flatbill in Poás Volcano National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Eye-ringed Flatbill in Poás Volcano National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see an Eye-ringed Flatbill?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eye-ringed Flatbill sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Poás Volcano National Park the best place to see an Eye-ringed Flatbill?
25th of 25
Of the 25 parks where we can rate Eye-ringed Flatbill sightings, Poás Volcano National Park ranks 25th at under 5%. The best odds are in Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 30%), Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 20%) and El Triunfo (Mexico, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Eye-ringed Flatbill live in Poás Volcano National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Eye-ringed Flatbill that you can see in Poás Volcano National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 20%), Mountain Elaenia (about 20%) and Great Kiskadee (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Eye-ringed Flatbill sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eye-ringed Flatbill is recorded against all the birds logged in Poás Volcano National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.