What are the chances of seeing a Baya Weaver in Ranthambore National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Baya Weaver sighting in Ranthambore National Park on a given day, based on 44 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 176th most-seen of the 251 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Baya Weaver in Ranthambore National Park?
July
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Baya Weaver in Ranthambore National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–April, June and September–November, the lowest months. That is one of Ranthambore National Park's wettest months, with about 250 mm of rain against 5 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Baya Weaver?
Between 4 and 7 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Baya Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Ranthambore National Park the best place to see a Baya Weaver?
15th of 27
Of the 27 parks where we can rate Baya Weaver sightings, Ranthambore National Park ranks 15th at under 5%. The best odds are in Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 30%), Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 20%) and Udawalawe National Park (Sri Lanka, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Baya Weaver live in Ranthambore National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Baya Weaver that you can see in Ranthambore National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Rufous Treepie (about 80%), Jungle Babbler (about 80%) and Indian Robin (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Baya Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Baya Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Ranthambore National Park (44 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.