What are the chances of seeing a White-necked Thrush in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a White-necked Thrush sighting in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 290th most-seen of the 418 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-necked Thrush in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
March
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a White-necked Thrush in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a White-necked Thrush?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-necked Thrush sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sierra de la Macarena National Park the best place to see a White-necked Thrush?
12th of 16
Of the 16 parks where we can rate White-necked Thrush sightings, Sierra de la Macarena National Park ranks 12th at under 5%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 40%), Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 40%) and Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the White-necked Thrush live in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Same genus: Turdus
The closest relatives of the White-necked Thrush that you can see in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (genus Turdus, Typical Thrushes) are Pale-breasted Thrush (about 30%) and Black-billed Thrush (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-necked Thrush sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-necked Thrush is recorded against all the birds logged in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.