What are the chances of seeing a Black-hooded Oriole in Yala National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Black-hooded Oriole sighting in Yala National Park on a given day, based on 417 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 47th most-seen of the 220 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-hooded Oriole in Yala National Park?
February and April–May
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Black-hooded Oriole in Yala National Park on a given day, against about 30% in June–July and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-hooded Oriole?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-hooded Oriole sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Yala National Park the best place to see a Black-hooded Oriole?
10th of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Black-hooded Oriole sightings, Yala National Park ranks 10th at about 40%. The best odds are in Kanha National Park (India, about 70%), Royal Bardia National Park (Nepal, about 60%) and Cat Tien National Park (Vietnam, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black-hooded Oriole live in Yala National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Black-hooded Oriole that you can see in Yala National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Indian Robin (about 80%), White-browed Fantail (about 60%) and Oriental Magpie-Robin (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-hooded Oriole sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-hooded Oriole is recorded against all the birds logged in Yala National Park (417 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.