What are the chances of seeing a Short-toed Eagle in Aigüestortes National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Short-toed Eagle sighting in Aigüestortes National Park on a given day, based on 157 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 48th most-seen of the 114 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Short-toed Eagle in Aigüestortes National Park?
June
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Short-toed Eagle in Aigüestortes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Short-toed Eagle?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Short-toed Eagle sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Aigüestortes National Park the best place to see a Short-toed Eagle?
6th of 30
Of the 30 parks where we can rate Short-toed Eagle sightings, Aigüestortes National Park ranks 6th at about 20%. The best odds are in Cévennes National Park (France, about 30%), Monfragüe National Park (Spain, about 20%) and Ecrins National Park (France, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Short-toed Eagle live in Aigüestortes National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Short-toed Eagle that you can see in Aigüestortes National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Griffon Vulture (about 70%), Bearded Vulture (about 30%) and Common Buzzard (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Short-toed Eagle sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Short-toed Eagle is recorded against all the birds logged in Aigüestortes National Park (157 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.