What are the chances of seeing a Variegated Flycatcher in Anavilhanas National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Variegated Flycatcher sighting in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, based on 71 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 76th most-seen of the 291 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Variegated Flycatcher in Anavilhanas National Park?
June and August
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Variegated Flycatcher in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in November, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Variegated Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Variegated Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Anavilhanas National Park the best place to see a Variegated Flycatcher?
Yes
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Variegated Flycatcher sightings, Anavilhanas National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Chapada Diamantina National Park (Brazil, about 10%) and Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Variegated Flycatcher live in Anavilhanas National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Variegated Flycatcher that you can see in Anavilhanas National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 50%), Snethlage's Tody-Tyrant (about 40%) and Great Kiskadee (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Variegated Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Variegated Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Anavilhanas National Park (71 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.