What are the chances of seeing an Orion Cecropian in Arenal Volcano National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Orion Cecropian sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 152nd most-seen of the 302 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Orion Cecropian in Arenal Volcano National Park?
April, July–August and October–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Orion Cecropian in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May–June and September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Orion Cecropian?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Orion Cecropian sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see an Orion Cecropian?
19th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Orion Cecropian sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 19th at about 10%. The best odds are in Ciénaga de Zapata (Cuba, about 40%), Rincón de la Vieja National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%) and Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Orion Cecropian live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Orion Cecropian that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Banded Peacock (about 30%), Banded Owl-Butterfly (about 20%) and Julia Heliconian (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Orion Cecropian sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Orion Cecropian is recorded against all the insects logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.