What are the chances of seeing a Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher in Beijing?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher sighting in Beijing on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 119th most-seen of the 324 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher in Beijing?
September
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher in Beijing on a given day, against under 5% in October to August, the lowest months. That is one of Beijing's wettest months, with about 65 mm of rain against almost none in January.
What time of day is best to see a Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher?
Between 5 and 8 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Beijing the best place to see a Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher?
22nd of 35
Of the 35 cities where we can rate Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher sightings, Beijing ranks 22nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Kathmandu (Nepal, about 20%), Dehradun (India, about 20%) and Jabalpur (India, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher live in Beijing?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher that you can see in Beijing (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Oriental Magpie (about 90%), Azure-winged Magpie (about 90%) and Eurasian Tree Sparrow (about 90%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Beijing (5 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.