What are the chances of seeing a Black Skimmer in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black Skimmer sighting in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 203rd most-seen of the 205 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Skimmer in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black Skimmer in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black Skimmer?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Skimmer sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park the best place to see a Black Skimmer?
28th of 28
Of the 28 parks where we can rate Black Skimmer sightings, Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park ranks 28th at under 5%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 60%), Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 50%) and Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge (United States, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black Skimmer live in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park?
Same family: Laridae
The closest relatives of the Black Skimmer that you can see in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park (family Laridae, Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers) are Royal Tern (about 30%), Laughing Gull (about 20%) and Sandwich Tern (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Skimmer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Skimmer is recorded against all the birds logged in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.