What are the chances of seeing a Mississippi Kite in El Impenetrable National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Mississippi Kite sighting in El Impenetrable National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 205th most-seen of the 219 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Mississippi Kite in El Impenetrable National Park?
January and February
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Mississippi Kite in El Impenetrable National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March to November, the lowest months. December has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Mississippi Kite?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Mississippi Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is El Impenetrable National Park the best place to see a Mississippi Kite?
6th of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Mississippi Kite sightings, El Impenetrable National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Cahuita National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%), Congaree National Park (United States, about 10%) and Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Mississippi Kite live in El Impenetrable National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Mississippi Kite that you can see in El Impenetrable National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Roadside Hawk (about 60%), Great Black-Hawk (about 30%) and Crane Hawk (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Mississippi Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Mississippi Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in El Impenetrable National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.