What are the chances of seeing a Lesser Scaup in Elk Island National Park?
Likely
About 60% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Scaup sighting in Elk Island National Park on a given day, based on 622 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 11th most-seen of the 161 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lesser Scaup in Elk Island National Park?
June
In that month about 80% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Scaup in Elk Island National Park on a given day, against about 10% in February, the lowest month. That is one of Elk Island National Park's wettest months, with about 110 mm of rain against 20 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Lesser Scaup?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lesser Scaup sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Elk Island National Park the best place to see a Lesser Scaup?
Yes
Of the 49 parks where we can rate Lesser Scaup sightings, Elk Island National Park has the highest daily chance: about 60%. Next come El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 40%) and Yellowstone National Park (United States, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Lesser Scaup live in Elk Island National Park?
Same genus: Aythya
The closest relatives of the Lesser Scaup that you can see in Elk Island National Park (genus Aythya, Scaups, Pochards, and Allies) are Ring-necked Duck (about 30%), Redhead (about 20%) and Canvasback (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lesser Scaup sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lesser Scaup is recorded against all the birds logged in Elk Island National Park (622 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.