What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Mourner in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Mourner sighting in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 443rd most-seen of the 542 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Mourner in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Mourner in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Mourner?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Mourner sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Farallones de Cali National Natural Park the best place to see a Rufous Mourner?
20th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Rufous Mourner sightings, Farallones de Cali National Natural Park ranks 20th at under 5%. The best odds are in Darién National Park (Panama, about 10%), Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 10%) and Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Rufous Mourner live in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous Mourner that you can see in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Golden-faced Tyrannulet (about 50%), Common Tody-Flycatcher (about 50%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Mourner sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Mourner is recorded against all the birds logged in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (18 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.