What are the chances of seeing a Cattle Tyrant in Henri Pittier National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cattle Tyrant sighting in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, based on 32 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 182nd most-seen of the 358 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cattle Tyrant in Henri Pittier National Park?
January–June and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cattle Tyrant in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July–October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Cattle Tyrant?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cattle Tyrant sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Henri Pittier National Park the best place to see a Cattle Tyrant?
11th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Cattle Tyrant sightings, Henri Pittier National Park ranks 11th at about 10%. The best odds are in Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 70%), El Palmar National Park (Argentina, about 60%) and El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Cattle Tyrant live in Henri Pittier National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Cattle Tyrant that you can see in Henri Pittier National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 40%), Tropical Kingbird (about 40%) and Social Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cattle Tyrant sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cattle Tyrant is recorded against all the birds logged in Henri Pittier National Park (32 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.