What are the chances of seeing a Baya Weaver in Jim Corbett National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Baya Weaver sighting in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, based on 113 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 199th most-seen of the 368 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Baya Weaver in Jim Corbett National Park?
August
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Baya Weaver in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July and October–April, the lowest months. That is one of Jim Corbett National Park's wettest months, with about 330 mm of rain against almost none in November.
What time of day is best to see a Baya Weaver?
Between 4 and 7 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Baya Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Jim Corbett National Park the best place to see a Baya Weaver?
12th of 27
Of the 27 parks where we can rate Baya Weaver sightings, Jim Corbett National Park ranks 12th at under 5%. The best odds are in Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 30%), Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 20%) and Udawalawe National Park (Sri Lanka, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Baya Weaver live in Jim Corbett National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Baya Weaver that you can see in Jim Corbett National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are White-cheeked Bulbul (about 60%), Jungle Babbler (about 60%) and Red-whiskered Bulbul (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Baya Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Baya Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Jim Corbett National Park (113 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.