What are the chances of seeing a Golden-fronted Woodpecker in Lago de Yojoa?
Very likely
About 70% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-fronted Woodpecker sighting in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, based on 664 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 3rd most-seen of the 263 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Golden-fronted Woodpecker in Lago de Yojoa?
March and June–July
In those months about 80% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-fronted Woodpecker in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, against about 50% in September, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Golden-fronted Woodpecker?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Golden-fronted Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lago de Yojoa the best place to see a Golden-fronted Woodpecker?
Among the best
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Golden-fronted Woodpecker sightings, Lago de Yojoa ranks 4th at about 70%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Sian Ka'an Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 70%), Cusuco National Park (Honduras, about 70%) and Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (Honduras, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Golden-fronted Woodpecker live in Lago de Yojoa?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Golden-fronted Woodpecker that you can see in Lago de Yojoa (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Golden-olive Woodpecker (about 10%), Lineated Woodpecker (about 10%) and Olivaceous Piculet (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Golden-fronted Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Golden-fronted Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Lago de Yojoa (664 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.