What are the chances of seeing a Golden-olive Woodpecker in Lago de Yojoa?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-olive Woodpecker sighting in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, based on 98 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 116th most-seen of the 263 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Golden-olive Woodpecker in Lago de Yojoa?
January, March, August and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-olive Woodpecker in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, against under 5% in April and September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Golden-olive Woodpecker?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Golden-olive Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lago de Yojoa the best place to see a Golden-olive Woodpecker?
15th of 35
Of the 35 parks where we can rate Golden-olive Woodpecker sightings, Lago de Yojoa ranks 15th at about 10%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 50%), El Triunfo (Mexico, about 40%) and Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Golden-olive Woodpecker live in Lago de Yojoa?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Golden-olive Woodpecker that you can see in Lago de Yojoa (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Golden-fronted Woodpecker (about 70%), Lineated Woodpecker (about 10%) and Olivaceous Piculet (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Golden-olive Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Golden-olive Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Lago de Yojoa (98 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.