What are the chances of seeing a Lineated Woodpecker in Lago de Yojoa?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lineated Woodpecker sighting in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, based on 71 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 135th most-seen of the 263 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lineated Woodpecker in Lago de Yojoa?
January and March
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Lineated Woodpecker in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, against under 5% in April, July and September–December, the lowest months. Those are among Lago de Yojoa's driest months, with about 95 mm of rain a month against 320 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Lineated Woodpecker?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lineated Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lago de Yojoa the best place to see a Lineated Woodpecker?
35th of 68
Of the 68 parks where we can rate Lineated Woodpecker sightings, Lago de Yojoa ranks 35th at about 10%. The best odds are in Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 40%), Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 30%) and Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Lineated Woodpecker live in Lago de Yojoa?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Lineated Woodpecker that you can see in Lago de Yojoa (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Golden-fronted Woodpecker (about 70%), Golden-olive Woodpecker (about 10%) and Olivaceous Piculet (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lineated Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lineated Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Lago de Yojoa (71 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.