What are the chances of seeing a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker in Lago de Yojoa?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker sighting in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 251st most-seen of the 263 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker in Lago de Yojoa?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow-bellied Sapsucker sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lago de Yojoa the best place to see a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker?
28th of 44
Of the 44 parks where we can rate Yellow-bellied Sapsucker sightings, Lago de Yojoa ranks 28th at under 5%. The best odds are in Riding Mountain National Park (Canada, about 40%), Congaree National Park (United States, about 30%) and Elk Island National Park (Canada, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker live in Lago de Yojoa?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker that you can see in Lago de Yojoa (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Golden-fronted Woodpecker (about 70%), Golden-olive Woodpecker (about 10%) and Lineated Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker is recorded against all the birds logged in Lago de Yojoa (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.