What are the chances of seeing a Wire-tailed Swallow in Mudumalai National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Wire-tailed Swallow sighting in Mudumalai National Park on a given day, based on 47 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 157th most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Wire-tailed Swallow in Mudumalai National Park?
January–March, May and August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Wire-tailed Swallow in Mudumalai National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June–July and September–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Wire-tailed Swallow?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Wire-tailed Swallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Mudumalai National Park the best place to see a Wire-tailed Swallow?
41st of 50
Of the 50 parks where we can rate Wire-tailed Swallow sightings, Mudumalai National Park ranks 41st at about 10%. The best odds are in Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 40%), Lower Zambezi National Park (Zambia, about 40%) and uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Wire-tailed Swallow live in Mudumalai National Park?
Same genus: Hirundo
The closest relatives of the Wire-tailed Swallow that you can see in Mudumalai National Park (genus Hirundo, Typical Swallows) are Hill Swallow (about 10%) and Barn Swallow (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Wire-tailed Swallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Wire-tailed Swallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Mudumalai National Park (47 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.