What are the chances of seeing an Orion Cecropian in Podocarpus National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report an Orion Cecropian sighting in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 28th most-seen of the 61 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Orion Cecropian in Podocarpus National Park?
January
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report an Orion Cecropian in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–April, June–July and September–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Orion Cecropian?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Orion Cecropian sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Podocarpus National Park the best place to see an Orion Cecropian?
8th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Orion Cecropian sightings, Podocarpus National Park ranks 8th at about 20%. The best odds are in Ciénaga de Zapata (Cuba, about 40%), Rincón de la Vieja National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%) and Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Orion Cecropian live in Podocarpus National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Orion Cecropian that you can see in Podocarpus National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Numata Longwing (about 30%), Pedaliodes pelinna (about 30%) and Blue-Topped Satyr (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Orion Cecropian sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Orion Cecropian is recorded against all the insects logged in Podocarpus National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.