What are the chances of seeing a Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher in Sepilok?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher sighting in Sepilok on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 212th most-seen of the 242 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher in Sepilok?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher in Sepilok on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher?
Between 5 and 8 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Sepilok the best place to see a Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher?
33rd of 33
Of the 33 parks where we can rate Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher sightings, Sepilok ranks 33rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Kerinci Seblat National Park (Indonesia, about 70%), Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 50%) and Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher live in Sepilok?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher that you can see in Sepilok (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Ashy Tailorbird (about 60%), Red-eyed Bulbul (about 50%) and Asian Glossy Starling (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Sepilok (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.