What are the chances of seeing a Black Swift in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black Swift sighting in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 134th most-seen of the 152 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Swift in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black Swift in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black Swift?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks the best place to see a Black Swift?
16th of 26
Of the 26 parks where we can rate Black Swift sightings, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks ranks 16th at under 5%. The best odds are in Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 10%), Jasper National Park (Canada, about 10%) and Glacier National Park (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Black Swift live in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Black Swift that you can see in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (family Apodidae, Swifts) are White-throated Swift (about 10%) and Vaux's Swift (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Swift is recorded against all the birds logged in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.