What are the chances of seeing a Fuscous Flycatcher in Serra da Canastra National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Fuscous Flycatcher sighting in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, based on 32 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 180th most-seen of the 294 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Fuscous Flycatcher in Serra da Canastra National Park?
March
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Fuscous Flycatcher in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, April, June and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Fuscous Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fuscous Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serra da Canastra National Park the best place to see a Fuscous Flycatcher?
6th of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Fuscous Flycatcher sightings, Serra da Canastra National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 30%), Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 10%) and Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Fuscous Flycatcher live in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Fuscous Flycatcher that you can see in Serra da Canastra National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 60%), White-rumped Monjita (about 50%) and Crested Black-Tyrant (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Fuscous Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fuscous Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Serra da Canastra National Park (32 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.