What are the chances of seeing a Slate-throated Redstart in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Slate-throated Redstart sighting in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park on a given day, based on 909 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 109th most-seen of the 467 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Slate-throated Redstart in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park?
September and October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Slate-throated Redstart in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March and April, the lowest months. Those are among Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park's wettest months, with about 530 mm of rain a month against 160 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Slate-throated Redstart?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Slate-throated Redstart sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park the best place to see a Slate-throated Redstart?
17th of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Slate-throated Redstart sightings, Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park ranks 17th at about 10%. The best odds are in Volcán Barú National Park (Panama, about 60%), Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, about 60%) and Reserva de la Biosfera Mariposa Monarca (Mexico, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Where does the Slate-throated Redstart sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Slate-throated Redstart is recorded against all the birds logged in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park (909 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.