What are the chances of seeing a Wattled Jacana in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Wattled Jacana sighting in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, based on 307 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 13th most-seen of the 436 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Wattled Jacana in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
February, June, August and December
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Wattled Jacana in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, against about 10% in January, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Wattled Jacana?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Wattled Jacana sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amacayacu National Natural Park the best place to see a Wattled Jacana?
5th of 26
Of the 26 parks where we can rate Wattled Jacana sightings, Amacayacu National Natural Park ranks 5th at about 30%. The best odds are in Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 70%), Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 60%) and Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Wattled Jacana live in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Same order: Charadriiformes
The closest relatives of the Wattled Jacana that you can see in Amacayacu National Natural Park (order Charadriiformes, Shorebirds and Allies) are Large-billed Tern (about 20%), Yellow-billed Tern (about 10%) and Spotted Sandpiper (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Wattled Jacana sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Wattled Jacana is recorded against all the birds logged in Amacayacu National Natural Park (307 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.