What are the chances of seeing a Black Skimmer in Anavilhanas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black Skimmer sighting in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 190th most-seen of the 291 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Skimmer in Anavilhanas National Park?
November to January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Skimmer in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black Skimmer?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Skimmer sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Anavilhanas National Park the best place to see a Black Skimmer?
15th of 28
Of the 28 parks where we can rate Black Skimmer sightings, Anavilhanas National Park ranks 15th at under 5%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 60%), Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 50%) and Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge (United States, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black Skimmer live in Anavilhanas National Park?
Same family: Laridae
The closest relatives of the Black Skimmer that you can see in Anavilhanas National Park (family Laridae, Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers) are Large-billed Tern (about 30%) and Yellow-billed Tern (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Skimmer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Skimmer is recorded against all the birds logged in Anavilhanas National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.