What are the chances of seeing a Wattled Jacana in Anavilhanas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Wattled Jacana sighting in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 182nd most-seen of the 291 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Wattled Jacana in Anavilhanas National Park?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Wattled Jacana in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, March and June–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Wattled Jacana?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Wattled Jacana sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Anavilhanas National Park the best place to see a Wattled Jacana?
13th of 26
Of the 26 parks where we can rate Wattled Jacana sightings, Anavilhanas National Park ranks 13th at under 5%. The best odds are in Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 70%), Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 60%) and Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Wattled Jacana live in Anavilhanas National Park?
Same order: Charadriiformes
The closest relatives of the Wattled Jacana that you can see in Anavilhanas National Park (order Charadriiformes, Shorebirds and Allies) are Large-billed Tern (about 30%), Yellow-billed Tern (about 10%) and Solitary Sandpiper (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Wattled Jacana sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Wattled Jacana is recorded against all the birds logged in Anavilhanas National Park (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.