What are the chances of seeing a Baya Weaver in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Baya Weaver sighting in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 188th most-seen of the 241 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Baya Weaver in Bandhavgarh National Park?
August and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Baya Weaver in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September and November–July, the lowest months. Those are among Bandhavgarh National Park's wettest months, with about 220 mm of rain a month against almost none in November.
What time of day is best to see a Baya Weaver?
Between 4 and 7 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Baya Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Bandhavgarh National Park the best place to see a Baya Weaver?
22nd of 27
Of the 27 parks where we can rate Baya Weaver sightings, Bandhavgarh National Park ranks 22nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 30%), Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 20%) and Udawalawe National Park (Sri Lanka, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Baya Weaver live in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Baya Weaver that you can see in Bandhavgarh National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Jungle Babbler (about 70%), Oriental Magpie-Robin (about 70%) and Large-billed Crow (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Baya Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Baya Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Bandhavgarh National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.