What are the chances of seeing a Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher in Carara National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher sighting in Carara National Park on a given day, based on 999 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 132nd most-seen of the 414 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher in Carara National Park?
March–April and September–October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher in Carara National Park on a given day, against about 10% in May–August and November–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Carara National Park the best place to see a Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher?
3rd of 27
Of the 27 parks where we can rate Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher sightings, Carara National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 20%) and Darién National Park (Panama, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher live in Carara National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher that you can see in Carara National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 60%), Tropical Kingbird (about 50%) and Social Flycatcher (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Carara National Park (999 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.