What are the chances of seeing a Pale-billed Woodpecker in Celaque National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Pale-billed Woodpecker sighting in Celaque National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 162nd most-seen of the 193 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pale-billed Woodpecker in Celaque National Park?
May and December–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pale-billed Woodpecker in Celaque National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–April and June–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pale-billed Woodpecker?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pale-billed Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Celaque National Park the best place to see a Pale-billed Woodpecker?
27th of 34
Of the 34 parks where we can rate Pale-billed Woodpecker sightings, Celaque National Park ranks 27th at under 5%. The best odds are in Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 50%), Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary (Belize, about 40%) and Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pale-billed Woodpecker live in Celaque National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Pale-billed Woodpecker that you can see in Celaque National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Acorn Woodpecker (about 60%), Golden-fronted Woodpecker (about 40%) and Golden-olive Woodpecker (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pale-billed Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pale-billed Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Celaque National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.