What are the chances of seeing a Rufescent Tiger Heron in Santa Cruz de la Sierra?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufescent Tiger Heron sighting in Santa Cruz de la Sierra on a given day, based on 48 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 68th most-seen of the 208 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufescent Tiger Heron in Santa Cruz de la Sierra?
September
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Rufescent Tiger Heron in Santa Cruz de la Sierra on a given day, against under 5% in December and January, the lowest months. That is one of Santa Cruz de la Sierra's driest months, with about 50 mm of rain against 170 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Rufescent Tiger Heron?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufescent Tiger Heron sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Santa Cruz de la Sierra the best place to see a Rufescent Tiger Heron?
3rd of 15
Of the 15 cities where we can rate Rufescent Tiger Heron sightings, Santa Cruz de la Sierra ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Buenos Aires (Argentina, about 30%) and Fortaleza (Brazil, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Rufescent Tiger Heron live in Santa Cruz de la Sierra?
Same family: Ardeidae
The closest relatives of the Rufescent Tiger Heron that you can see in Santa Cruz de la Sierra (family Ardeidae, Herons, Egrets, and Bitterns) are Great Egret (about 40%), Whistling Heron (about 30%) and Striated Heron (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufescent Tiger Heron sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufescent Tiger Heron is recorded against all the birds logged in Santa Cruz de la Sierra (48 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.