What are the chances of seeing a Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher in Darién National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher sighting in Darién National Park on a given day, based on 76 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 78th most-seen of the 397 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher in Darién National Park?
January, April and September
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher in Darién National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Darién National Park the best place to see a Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher?
Among the best
Of the 27 parks where we can rate Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher sightings, Darién National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher live in Darién National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher that you can see in Darién National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Bright-rumped Attila (about 20%), Tropical Kingbird (about 20%) and Acadian Flycatcher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Darién National Park (76 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.