What are the chances of seeing a Hadada in Golden Gate Highlands National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Hadada sighting in Golden Gate Highlands National Park on a given day, based on 58 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 9th most-seen of the 108 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hadada in Golden Gate Highlands National Park?
October
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Hadada in Golden Gate Highlands National Park on a given day, against about 30% in June and July, the lowest months. March has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Hadada?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hadada sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Golden Gate Highlands National Park the best place to see a Hadada?
15th of 52
Of the 52 parks where we can rate Hadada sightings, Golden Gate Highlands National Park ranks 15th at about 50%. The best odds are in Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 70%), Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 70%) and Addo Elephant National Park (South Africa, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Hadada live in Golden Gate Highlands National Park?
Same family: Threskiornithidae
The closest relatives of the Hadada that you can see in Golden Gate Highlands National Park (family Threskiornithidae, Ibises and Spoonbills) are Southern Bald Ibis (about 20%) and African Sacred Ibis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hadada sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hadada is recorded against all the birds logged in Golden Gate Highlands National Park (58 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.