What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Woodpecker in Gunung Leuser National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Woodpecker sighting in Gunung Leuser National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 107th most-seen of the 166 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Woodpecker in Gunung Leuser National Park?
June, August and November–December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Woodpecker in Gunung Leuser National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–May, July and September–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Woodpecker?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Gunung Leuser National Park the best place to see a Rufous Woodpecker?
20th of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Rufous Woodpecker sightings, Gunung Leuser National Park ranks 20th at under 5%. The best odds are in Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 30%), Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 20%) and Periyar National Park (India, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Rufous Woodpecker live in Gunung Leuser National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous Woodpecker that you can see in Gunung Leuser National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Crimson-winged Woodpecker (about 20%), Banded Woodpecker (about 10%) and Sunda Pygmy Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Gunung Leuser National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.