What are the chances of seeing a Variegated Flycatcher in Henri Pittier National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Variegated Flycatcher sighting in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 240th most-seen of the 358 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Variegated Flycatcher in Henri Pittier National Park?
April
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Variegated Flycatcher in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–July and September–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Variegated Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Variegated Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Henri Pittier National Park the best place to see a Variegated Flycatcher?
10th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Variegated Flycatcher sightings, Henri Pittier National Park ranks 10th at under 5%. The best odds are in Anavilhanas National Park (Brazil, about 20%), Chapada Diamantina National Park (Brazil, about 10%) and Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Variegated Flycatcher live in Henri Pittier National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Variegated Flycatcher that you can see in Henri Pittier National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 40%), Tropical Kingbird (about 40%) and Social Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Variegated Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Variegated Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Henri Pittier National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.