What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Woodpecker in Kanha National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Woodpecker sighting in Kanha National Park on a given day, based on 524 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 111th most-seen of the 286 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Woodpecker in Kanha National Park?
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Woodpecker in Kanha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July and September–January, the lowest months. That is one of Kanha National Park's wettest months, with about 220 mm of rain against 10 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Woodpecker?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kanha National Park the best place to see a Rufous Woodpecker?
14th of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Rufous Woodpecker sightings, Kanha National Park ranks 14th at about 10%. The best odds are in Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 30%), Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 20%) and Periyar National Park (India, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Rufous Woodpecker live in Kanha National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous Woodpecker that you can see in Kanha National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Black-rumped Flameback (about 50%), White-naped Woodpecker (about 30%) and Brown-capped Woodpecker (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Kanha National Park (524 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.