What are the chances of seeing an Asian Koel in Keoladeo National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report an Asian Koel sighting in Keoladeo National Park on a given day, based on 444 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 114th most-seen of the 278 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Asian Koel in Keoladeo National Park?
May
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report an Asian Koel in Keoladeo National Park on a given day, against about 10% in November to February, the lowest months. That is one of Keoladeo National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain against 240 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see an Asian Koel?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Asian Koel sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Keoladeo National Park the best place to see an Asian Koel?
12th of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Asian Koel sightings, Keoladeo National Park ranks 12th at about 20%. The best odds are in Gir National Park (India, about 40%), Udawalawe National Park (Sri Lanka, about 40%) and Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Asian Koel live in Keoladeo National Park?
Same family: Cuculidae
The closest relatives of the Asian Koel that you can see in Keoladeo National Park (family Cuculidae, Cuckoos) are Greater Coucal (about 70%), Common Hawk-Cuckoo (about 20%) and Jacobin Cuckoo (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Asian Koel sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Asian Koel is recorded against all the birds logged in Keoladeo National Park (444 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.