What are the chances of seeing a Gray-crowned Yellowthroat in Lago de Yojoa?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Gray-crowned Yellowthroat sighting in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, based on 25 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 191st most-seen of the 263 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Gray-crowned Yellowthroat in Lago de Yojoa?
March–April and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Gray-crowned Yellowthroat in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, against under 5% in May–October and December–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Gray-crowned Yellowthroat?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gray-crowned Yellowthroat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lago de Yojoa the best place to see a Gray-crowned Yellowthroat?
11th of 31
Of the 31 parks where we can rate Gray-crowned Yellowthroat sightings, Lago de Yojoa ranks 11th at under 5%. The best odds are in Rincón de la Vieja National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%), El Triunfo (Mexico, about 10%) and Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Gray-crowned Yellowthroat live in Lago de Yojoa?
Same genus: Geothlypis
The closest relatives of the Gray-crowned Yellowthroat that you can see in Lago de Yojoa (genus Geothlypis, Yellowthroats and Allies) are Common Yellowthroat (about 30%) and Kentucky Warbler (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Gray-crowned Yellowthroat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gray-crowned Yellowthroat is recorded against all the birds logged in Lago de Yojoa (25 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.