What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-sided Warbler in Lago de Yojoa?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-sided Warbler sighting in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, based on 245 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 63rd most-seen of the 263 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-sided Warbler in Lago de Yojoa?
February and November
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-sided Warbler in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, against under 5% in May–June and August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-sided Warbler?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-sided Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lago de Yojoa the best place to see a Chestnut-sided Warbler?
14th of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Chestnut-sided Warbler sightings, Lago de Yojoa ranks 14th at about 30%. The best odds are in Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 50%), Riding Mountain National Park (Canada, about 40%) and Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Chestnut-sided Warbler live in Lago de Yojoa?
Same genus: Setophaga
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-sided Warbler that you can see in Lago de Yojoa (genus Setophaga, Setophaga Warblers) are Yellow Warbler (about 40%), Magnolia Warbler (about 30%) and Northern Yellow Warbler (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-sided Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-sided Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Lago de Yojoa (245 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.