What are the chances of seeing a Hadada in Mana Pools National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Hadada sighting in Mana Pools National Park on a given day, based on 241 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 25th most-seen of the 275 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hadada in Mana Pools National Park?
August
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Hadada in Mana Pools National Park on a given day, against about 30% in February, the lowest month. That is one of Mana Pools National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 290 mm in January. March has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Hadada?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hadada sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Mana Pools National Park the best place to see a Hadada?
22nd of 52
Of the 52 parks where we can rate Hadada sightings, Mana Pools National Park ranks 22nd at about 50%. The best odds are in Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 70%), Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 70%) and Addo Elephant National Park (South Africa, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Hadada live in Mana Pools National Park?
Same family: Threskiornithidae
The closest relatives of the Hadada that you can see in Mana Pools National Park (family Threskiornithidae, Ibises and Spoonbills) are Glossy Ibis (about 40%), African Sacred Ibis (about 40%) and African Spoonbill (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hadada sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hadada is recorded against all the birds logged in Mana Pools National Park (241 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.