What are the chances of seeing a Common Tailorbird in Manas National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Common Tailorbird sighting in Manas National Park on a given day, based on 370 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 59th most-seen of the 377 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Tailorbird in Manas National Park?
February and July
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Common Tailorbird in Manas National Park on a given day, against about 10% in March, August and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Common Tailorbird?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Tailorbird sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Manas National Park the best place to see a Common Tailorbird?
25th of 34
Of the 34 parks where we can rate Common Tailorbird sightings, Manas National Park ranks 25th at about 20%. The best odds are in Kanha National Park (India, about 60%), Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 60%) and Bandhavgarh National Park (India, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Tailorbird live in Manas National Park?
Same family: Cisticolidae
The closest relatives of the Common Tailorbird that you can see in Manas National Park (family Cisticolidae, Cisticolas and Allies) are Ashy Prinia (about 20%), Plain Prinia (about 10%) and Golden-headed Cisticola (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Tailorbird sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Tailorbird is recorded against all the birds logged in Manas National Park (370 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.